YUKON DOESN'T NEED MORE LAWS ON FIREARMES PEOPLE ARE BEING PLAYED INTO A BAD DEAL YUKON CANNOT SUPERSEDE FEDERAL LAW AND SAYING IT WANTS A HOME GROWN CHIEF FIREARMS OFFICER TO OURSELVES IS CORRUPTION AND ILLEGAL

We do not need more legislation to control Yukoners. We had a working way of life before this debate, and we can have one again without creating new rules, new offices, and new layers of government power. Every new law comes with more control, more paperwork, more costs, and more opportunity for that power to be turned against ordinary taxpayers and gun owners.

What starts as “representation” or “public safety” often becomes a political tool. Once the government creates a new firearms office or new regulatory framework, it does not disappear when the political mood changes. It stays in place, grows in scope, and can be used by the next party in power to tighten restrictions, increase enforcement, and burden law-abiding people who never asked for any of it. That is the real danger: laws made today can become the weapons used against taxpayers and gun owners tomorrow.

This is why we should be cautious. Yukon does not need more legislation to manage people’s rights. It needs less interference, less expansion of government authority, and more respect for the people who are already following the law. If a future government wants more control, this kind of legislation gives them the framework to do it.

again let me put in a different manner We do not need more legislation to control us. We do not need another government office, another layer of bureaucracy, or another set of rules that can be turned against honest taxpayers and law-abiding gun owners.

Yukon was getting by before this debate, and we can get by without building a new political machine around firearms. That is what this really is: not common sense, not freedom, but the slow expansion of government power. Once that power is created, it does not sit still. It grows. It gets funded. It gets defended. And when a new political party takes over, it can be used to tighten the screws on the very people who were told it was there to “help.”

That is the problem with this kind of legislation. It is never just about today. It becomes a tool for tomorrow. A tool to add costs, add restrictions, add enforcement, and add pressure on people who are already obeying the law. And when government starts creating laws to manage citizens instead of serving them, that is not protection — that is control.

We should reject more legislation that only increases government reach. We do not need to be managed. We do not need to be supervised. We do not need to be disarmed by bureaucracy. We need government to back off, respect our rights, and stop pretending that more control is the same thing as public good.

We tried to say in two different ways but it's up to you to decide if you think today's government is doing something nice for you today or are they setting the next government to exploits the new law to use it as a tool to manipulate future taxpayers into submissions.

THE MASSAGE HERE IS THEY DON'T WANT TO FOLLOW THE FEDERAL LAW BUT WANT TO CREATE THEIR OWN...THINK BEFORE ALLOWING THIS TYPE OF LAW IT WILL DESTROY US IN THE FUTURE